A recent report of a possible mountain lion near Sacramento International Airport turned out to be something very different. According to KCRA, the animal spotted lying in a muddy canal was not a cougar at all, but an abandoned French bulldog.
The dog was rescued and taken to a shelter after wildlife responders determined it had likely been dumped. While the story quickly went viral, it also highlighted a familiar issue in wildlife reporting: misidentification.
But misidentification doesn’t mean reports should be dismissed outright. It means they should be verified.
That distinction matters when discussing mountain lions, especially outside the western United States. In many regions, cougars are still considered absent based on official range maps. When sightings occur outside those boundaries, they are often written off immediately.
Sometimes that’s justified. Sometimes it isn’t.
I recently documented clear photographic evidence of mountain lions outside the accepted range, taken in East Texas. These images are not folklore or rumor. They are photographs evaluated in context with known mountain lion anatomy, behavior, and dispersal patterns.
I break down the evidence and what it does and does not suggest — in this video:
Mountain Lions Where They’re Not Supposed to Be (Photographic Evidence from East Texas)
👉Click here to watch.
The Sacramento case ended with a dog being rescued because someone took a report seriously enough to investigate. That same principle applies everywhere.
Verification matters.
Chester Moore
Follow Chester Moore and Higher Calling Wildlife® on the following social media platforms
To support the efforts of Higher Calling Wildlife® click here.
Subscribe to the Dark Outdoors podcast on all major podcasting platforms.
Higher Calling Wildlife on Facebook
Email Chester at chester@chestermoore.com.
